Introduction of ‘The Bastard’ in the Urban Fabric of the Tetuan Medina - Dar Oddi House
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The medina of Tetuan has suffered a steady growing since its founding at the end of xv century by Sidi al-Mandary. It has always followed the Islamic city rules and included those works carried away by the sultan. This process had two breaking moments, that of the occupation of the city by the Spanish army in 1860 and the establishment of the Spanish protectorate. The first inside widening of the Luneta Street of the medina took place when the Rif War had already finished (provoked by the establishment of the Spanish Protectorate). The Widening was being built and the "modernity" could astonish anyone. The motives for Hadj Ahmed El Oddi to build his own house in the heart of the medina should be searched in the "kaida", that is the tradition so close to the muslin character of Tetuan. Building inside the medina meant not only keeping the familiar tradition but following the way of life their family, neighbours, friends kept. It was considered improper to do it in a different place. They could own properties in the new quarters, but only to be rented, not to be first residence. Dar Oddi was built in 1920 in the city centre al-Blal, the oldest quarter of the medina of Tetuan. Built on the foundation of a demolished house would be built as the new houses already built inside the medina by neighbours and relatives. That 'current fashion' was similar to a muslin house of the beginning of the xx century: based on the tradition but contaminated by the social changes taking place outside he medina and in short inside.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".