Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el casco antiguo de Barcelona la vivienda está sufriendo una profunda mutación: está pasando de ser un derecho a ser un negocio y eso está comportando la mutación del propio modelo de ciudad. Lo más grave es que este fenómeno está provocando la proliferación de prácticas abusivas contrarias a ley que vulneran abiertamente el legítimo ejercicio de ese derecho. Para entender la dimensión del problema, es necesario acotar primero cuál es el alcance del derecho a la vivienda. En este artículo se hace un enfoque a la problemática del derecho a la vivienda comprendiéndolo desde la normativa vigente y su aplicación y se proponen unas soluciones que podrían coadyuvar a garantizar este derecho en un territorio tan complejo como lo es la Ciutat Vella de Barcelona. In the old city center of Barcelona, housing is experiencing a serious mutation. Residence is no longer a right, instead is becoming a business. This transformation causes evident mutations in the city’s particular model. Abusive practices related to the violation of this right are persistent. In order to understand correctly the dimension of the problem, it is necessary to first define the scope of the right to housing. This article focuses on the issue of the right to housing by understanding it from the current legislation and its application, also proposes solutions that could help to guarantee this right in a convoluted territory as Ciutat Vella.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".