MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766245230 · doi:10.1002/rth2.12051

Global public awareness about atrial fibrillation

2017· article· en· W2766245230 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aaron M. Wendelboe, Gary E. Raskob, Pantep Angchaisuksiri, A Blanco, Harry R. Büller, Henry Ddungu, Justin Dvorak, Beverley J. Hunt, Elaine M. Hylek, Ajay K. Kakkar, Stavros Konstantinides, Micah McCumber, Claire McLintock, Tetsumei Urano, Jeffrey I. Weitz

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
FundersIonis PharmaceuticalsInternational Society on Thrombosis and HaemostasisPfizerDaiichi Sankyo EuropeEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationMedicineStroke (engine)DemographicsPalpitationsThrombosisDeep veinInternal medicineCross-sectional studyDemographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Essentials•Early recognition of atrial fibrillation helps in stroke prevention.•Survey in 10 countries to assess public awareness of atrial fibrillation.•Overall global awareness of atrial fibrillation was 48%.•Less than 46% of participants were aware atrial fibrillation leads to stroke.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe thank Ipsos‐Reid for their invaluable assistance with this survey and ISTH for their support and funding.Sources of Funding: The International Society on Thrombosis and HaemostasisInternational Society on Thrombosis and HaemostasisBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is an important cause of ischemic stroke that often remains undetected until stroke occurs. Awareness of the risk factors and symptoms is important so that AF can be diagnosed and thromboprophylaxis given. However, the extent of public awareness of AF is uncertain. We assessed public awareness of AF across six continents and compared it with that of other thrombotic and non‐thrombotic disorders.MethodsIn collaboration with Ipsos‐Reid, we conducted an internet‐based, cross‐sectional survey between September and October of 2016 in 10 countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Thailand, the Netherlands, Uganda, United Kingdom, and United States. Participants were selected from survey panels in weighted, age‐stratified categories (40‐60, 61‐74, and ≥75 years). The survey included 11 questions about demographics and assessed awareness about AF, as well as that of other thrombotic and non‐thrombotic disorders. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.ResultsOf a total of 6312 respondents, overall awareness of AF was 48% (95% CI, 46‐50%), which was lower than awareness about other thrombotic and non‐thrombotic disorders except for deep vein thrombosis (awareness 43%, 95% CI, 41‐45%). Awareness about AF ranged from 25% to 69% across countries, while awareness of the risk factors for AF ranged from 8% to 52%, and awareness that AF leads to stroke ranged from 36% to 46%. Among those reporting awareness of AF, 82% correctly identified palpitations as an AF symptom.ConclusionsGlobal public awareness of AF is low. Improving awareness may empower patients to seek timelier stroke preventive care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.431
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207