A certain class of weighted statistical convergence and associated Korovkin‐type approximation theorems involving trigonometric functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of statistical convergence has attracted a remarkably large number of researchers due mainly to the fact that it is more general than the well‐established theory of the ordinary (classical) convergence. In the year 2013, Edely et al introduced and studied the notion of weighted statistical convergence. In our present investigation, we make use of the (presumably new) notion of the deferred weighted statistical convergence to present Korovkin‐type approximation theorems associated with the periodic functions , and defined on a Banach space . In particular, we apply our concept of the deferred weighted statistical convergence with a view to proving a Korovkin‐type approximation theorem for periodic functions and also to demonstrate that our result is a nontrivial extension of several known Korovkin‐type approximation theorems which were given in earlier works. Moreover, we establish another result for the rate of the deferred weighted statistical convergence for the same set of functions. Finally, we consider a number of interesting special cases and illustrative examples in support of our definitions and of the results which are presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it