MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766413113 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v8i11.2813

A 37-Year-Old Female With Abdominal Pain and Diarrhea: A Case of Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

2017· article· en· W2766413113 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ivan E. Ramirez De Oleo, Abigail Lofchie, Mateo Mejía Saldarriaga, Muhammad A. Pervez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEsophagogastroduodenoscopyEosinophiliaAbdominal painDysphagiaDiarrheaBloody diarrheaGastroenterologyEosinophilic gastroenteritisHypereosinophilic syndromeInternal medicinePathologicalErythemaEosinophilDermatologyPathologySurgeryEndoscopyAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of a 37-year-old female who presented with diffuse abdominal pain associated with dysphagia, weight loss, and history of chronic non-bloody diarrhea. Labs showed severe eosinophilia and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed patchy erythema in antrum and body of the stomach. The pathological exam showed lymphoplasmacytic inflammation of lamina propria with increased eosinophil count and eosinophilic abscesses. The immunophenotypic analysis did not show evidence of clonality. There was no evidence of allergic reaction or infection. In view of the absence of causes to explain severe eosinophilia, the diagnosis of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) was made and she was started on steroids with improvement in her symptoms and eosinophils counts in subsequent evaluations. J Med Cases. 2017;8(11):335-339 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc2813w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207