MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766622519 · doi:10.1049/mnl.2017.0461

Fast synthesis of methacrylated graphene oxide: a graphene‐functionalised nanostructure

2017· article· en· W2766622519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicro & Nano Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGraphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIran University of Science and TechnologyBeef Cattle Research CouncilInternational University for Science and Technology
KeywordsGrapheneFourier transform infrared spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyMaterials scienceMethacrylateTransmission electron microscopyNanomaterialsScanning electron microscopeOxideSpectroscopyNanotechnologyChemical engineeringNanostructureAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CopolymerChemistryPolymerOrganic chemistryComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graphene oxide (GO) was successfully synthesised via modified Hummer method and functionalised by methacrylate named MeGO (metacrylated GO). Different characterisation methods containing UV–vis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) analyses were employed to characterise the structure and morphology of MeGO. The outputs of the different analyses confirmed each other and proved the presence of the methacrylate functional group on the surface of the GO. Displacement in the peaks of UV–vis analysis coupled with the new peaks in FTIR results clearly demonstrated the creation of a new functional group. The G/D ratio of MeGO in Raman spectroscopy has increased to 1.17 and FESEM and TEM investigations confirmed the wrinkled structure of MeGO sheets. Also, it was observed that the distance between the GO layers was increased about 2.86 nm after functionalisation of GO layers by methacrylate groups. This nanomaterial with difference characterisation and specific properties in comparison with GO could be a great candidate for further developments in industrial and biomedical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it