Molecular dynamics simulations for CL-20/TNT co-crystal based polymer-bonded explosives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out to study the polymer-bonded explosives (PBXs) where the explosive base was the well-known high energy co-crystal compound, 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexazaisowurtzitane/2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (CL-20/TNT), and the polymer binders were fluorine rubber (F[Formula: see text], fluorine resin (F[Formula: see text], polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) and polystyrene (PS), respectively. The binding energies, pair correlation functions (PCFs) and mechanical properties of the PBXs were reported. According to our theoretical results of binding energies, the compatibility of the PBXs is predicted to be in the following order: CL-20/TNT/PVAc[Formula: see text] CL-20/TNT/F[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] CL-20/TNT/PS [Formula: see text] CL-20/TNT/F[Formula: see text]. The binding energies of the PBXs on three crystalline surfaces, (100), (001), (010), of the CL-20/TNT co-crystal were also compared: CL-20/TNT(100)[Formula: see text]CL-20/TNT(001)[Formula: see text]CL-20/TNT(010) for F[Formula: see text], F[Formula: see text], and PS; CL-20/TNT(001)[Formula: see text]CL-20/TNT(100)[Formula: see text]CL-20/TNT(010) for PVAc. The PCF analysis reveals that there exist H-bonds between H and O, F, and N atoms on all three interfaces and among all H-bonds, N H-bond has the fewest number. For the CL-20/TNT co-crystal, the moduli can be reduced by adding a small amount of the polymer binders but the ductility can be prolonged only by F[Formula: see text] and F[Formula: see text].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".