Enhanced recovery and recycling of catalyst by post‐impregnation of γ‐Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> with 12‐tungstophosphoric acid for esterification reaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
12‐tungstophosphoric acid, polyoxometalate with Keggin structure, and γ‐Al 2 O 3 were synthesized. Loading of 12‐tungstophosphoric acid (HPW) on γ‐Al 2 O 3 was performed by the post‐impregnation method. The catalysts were characterized by XRD, SEM, FTIR, BET, and DRS techniques. According to the pertinent observation, using the post‐impregnation method promises the stability of polyoxometalate Keggin structure after loading on γ‐Al 2 O 3 support. The stability of 20 %HPW/Al 2 O 3 was also confirmed by a leaching test. Textural characterization demonstrates that HPW on the γ‐Al 2 O 3 had a much larger surface area as compared with the pure HPW. The 20 %HPW/Al 2 O 3 exhibited roughly high activity toward an esterification reaction. The influence of various reaction parameters (% loading HPW on support, reaction temperature, reaction time, catalyst weight, and acid/alcohol molar ratio) on the catalytic performance was studied. The efficiency of catalytic activity for six cycles remains approximately constant, which confirms the enhanced recovery and recycling of the catalyst. The kinetics of the esterification reaction and the kinetic parameters such as rate constants and activation energy were determined (25.37 kJ/mol).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it