MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766680517 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2017-0178

Phytohormone profiling reveals fungal signatures and strong manipulation of infection cycle in the <i>Gymnosporangium juniper-virginianae</i> dual-host plant system

2017· article· en· W2766680517 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kyle Moffatt, Carolina Monroy Flores, Peter Andreas, Anna Kisiała, R. J. Neil Emery

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBotanyAbscisic acidGallPathogenic fungusFungus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work was to examine the function of phytohormones in the pathogenesis of cedar-apple rust, a fungal disease caused by Gymnosporangium juniper-virginianae Schwein. on Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) and crabapple trees (Malus spp. Mill.). Control cedar branchlets, gall tissues, fungal telial horns, as well as healthy and infected apple leaves were collected throughout fungal and plant development and used for profiling endogenous cytokinins (CK) and abscisic acid (ABA) by high performance liquid chromatography – electrospray ionization – tandem mass spectrometry. Phytohormone composition implicates cytokinin involvement in the development of rust infection. Moreover, increased levels of total CKs, as well as the unique profiles of sporulating galls on cedar trees, telial horns, and infected apple leaves, dominated by cis-Zeatin type CK, suggest that the fungus can synthesize hormones to facilitate the infection process. Distribution of ABA in the fungal and plant tissues indicates an important function of this stress hormone in regulating rapid changes in osmotic pressure during teliospore production by the galls. This study of the cedar-apple rust disease cycle is the first elucidation of phytohormones profiling between a pathogenic fungus and the attacked plant in a dual-host infection system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207