MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766740922 · doi:10.2118/188150-ms

Impact of Slow and Fast Warm-Up Rates on Cement Sheath Integrity in SAGD Wells: Using Dynamic Flow Simulators for Early Time Analysis

2017· article· en· W2766740922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlos Nascimento, Barkim Demirdal

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Thermal Well Integrity and Design Symposium · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringInjectorCasingSteam injectionDrillingSteam-assisted gravity drainageInjection wellOil wellEnvironmental scienceAsphaltLost circulationGeologyDrilling fluidOil sandsEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The original viscosity of the oil in place is greater than 1,000,000 centipoises in most cases in Western Canada. As a result, steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a widely used thermal recovery method to produce bitumen reserves for the last 10-15 years. SAGD involves drilling two horizontal wells (one on top of each other roughly 5 meters) apart and injecting steam from the top well (called "injector") to reduce the viscosity of oil in place by heating and produce the flowing oil from the bottom one (called "producer"). Initially, there is very little to no pressure communication between the injector and producer since the bitumen is in solid state. As a result, in order to initiate communication between the wells so steam injection can penetrate into the reservoir to heat the rock and the fluids, both wells were circulated with steam and this phase is called "circulation". During circulation, steam is injected to the wells through long tubing and returns are received back through short tubing. In addition to be quite critical to the overall production performance of the reservoir, circulation phase has a critical impact on the integrity of the well since during this phase the well was introduced to heating for the first time. Considering the fact that steam is being injected in a cold well, thermal loading impacts on casing and cement are expected to be the highest during earlier times of circulation. While injecting steam at higher rates as early as possible has operational benefits, effects of such practice on zonal isolation should be evaluated in detail. A well operated by Devon in Jackfish field was used for this purpose and a dynamic flow simulator was modelled to investigate the impact of slow (going from 1 ton/hr to 5 ton/hr in 5 days) versus fast warm-up during early stages of circulation phase on cement sheath. Field data captured by distributed temperature sensing system (DTS) was used to validate the model and comparison on cement heating rate at different depth intervals during slow and fast warm up cases were made to determine at what depths and durations the heating rates of cement are different between the two cases. The combination of the field results and simulation enabled to determine the critical time frame where different circulation strategies have the highest impact on cement heating rates. The simulation results also provided insight on transient temperature distribution across wellbore and near wellbore during early times of circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Thermal Well Integrity and Design SymposiumSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207