MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2766833948 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.ns11

Abstract NS11: Identifying Discharge Needs for Stroke Patients Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

2017· article· en· W2766833948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sanny Djoeva, Melissa Angulo, Kay McGee, Fernando D. Testai, Maureen Hillmann

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentStroke (engine)Subarachnoid hemorrhagePopulationIntracerebral hemorrhagePhysical therapyCognitionRehabilitationCognitive declineEmergency medicinePediatricsInternal medicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDiseaseDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients who develop a stroke are at high risk for cognitive decline. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) is a validated tool for assessing cognitive function within this patient population prior to discharge. An important limitation of the MOCA is that often times there is no pre-morbid score for comparison. Despite this, consideration of occupational and cognitive therapy is important in this population because of the high risk for cognitive decline. Methods: A total of 231 patients were treated on the stroke unit from December 2015 to June 2016, of these 149 patients were excluded due to activity intolerance, severe communication barriers, patient refusal, or cognitive deficits exceeding the limit of the screening tool. A retrospective chart review was conducted on the 82 patients and data on demographics, stroke risk factors, stroke type (ischemic, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage), MOCA scores, and discharge disposition (home or acute/subacute rehabilitation) was extracted. Results: Of the 82 patients in the study, 45 (55%) were male, with an average age of 54.9 years. Thirty-eight (46%) of these patients suffered hemorrhagic strokes. Average MOCA scores for hemorrhagic stroke patients who were either discharged home versus a rehab setting were similar when compared to the ischemic stroke population (20.1 and 18.2 versus 21.3 and 16.9, respectively). However, when subcategorized by stroke subtype, the subarachnoid hemorrhage population exhibited higher MOCA scores for those who were discharged home or to rehab versus the patients with ICH who were discharged home or to rehab (21.9 and 25.4 versus 19.1 and 13.6, respectively). Interestingly, the patients within the SAH cohort who were discharged to rehab had a higher MOCA average than those who were discharged home. Conclusion: Many patients who suffer hemorrhagic strokes in this population are discharged home despite having a MOCA score below normal (<26). This may demonstrate residual cognitive deficits as a result of their disease process. Despite a patient’s ability to be functionally and physically able to return home, there is an identified need for addressing cognitive deficits in order to improve quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→