MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766870794 · doi:10.1111/jfb.13473

Life history and ecology of the elusive European short‐snouted seahorse <scp><i>Hippocampus hippocampus</i></scp>

2017· article· en· W2766870794 on OpenAlexafffund
J. M. R. Curtis, S. V. Santos, Julie L. Nadeau, B.M. Gunn, K. Bigney Wilner, Hari Balasubramanian, Sarah E. Overington, C.‐M. Lesage, J. D'entremont, K. Wieckowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquatic life and conservation
Canadian institutionsTechnical University of Nova ScotiaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche
KeywordsSeahorseBiologyReproductionEcologyLife historyPopulationLife history theoryZoologyFisheryDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve the understanding of the life history and ecology of one of Europe's most elusive fishes, the short‐snouted seahorse Hippocampus hippocampus , data from wild populations in a shallow coastal lagoon in southern Portugal were analysed. The data were collected from 17 tagged seahorses on a focal‐study grid as well as from &gt;350 seahorses encountered during underwater visual surveys and a fishery‐independent study using beach seines. These populations of settled juveniles and adults had a mean population density of 0·009 m −2 . During the study period (2000–2004), reproduction peaked in July and August. Juveniles recruited to the lagoon at c . 66 mm standard length ( L S ) and 0·5 years of age and established small home ranges (0·8 to 18·2 m 2 ). First reproduction was estimated at 100 mm and 1 year of age. Based on a fitted von Bertalanffy model, H. hippocampus grew quickly (growth coefficient K = 0·93) to a maximum theoretical size L ∞ = 150 mm and have a maximum lifespan of c . 3·2 years. Courtship behaviours were consistent with the maintenance of pair bonds and males brooded multiple batches of young per year. Estimated annual reproductive output averaged 871 young (±632). Together these analyses provide the first life‐history parameters for this species and indicate that H. hippocampus bears characteristics of opportunist and intermediate strategists. Such populations are predicted to exhibit large fluctuations in abundance, making them vulnerable to extended periods of poor recruitment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicAquatic life and conservationFrench-language works237,207