Organocatalysis using aldehydes: the development and improvement of catalytic hydroaminations, hydrations and hydrolyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organocatalysis has emerged as a powerful approach to facilitate and accelerate various difficult reactions. This Feature article presents recent developments and improvements using aldehydes as catalysts in difficult Cope-type intermolecular hydroamination, hydration and hydrolysis reactions. Most reactions exploit temporary intramolecularity. In catalytic Cope-type hydroaminations of allylic amines, aldehydes act as tethering catalysts, and allow room temperature reactions and high enantio- or diastereoselectivities if chiral aldehydes or reagents are used. Mechanistic studies showed that simpler catalysts such as formaldehyde are more active due to an improved ability to form the temporary tether, which translated in an improved reaction scope. Gratifyingly, improved catalytic efficiency and broad reaction scope were also observed in the aldehyde-catalyzed hydration of α-amino nitriles. Since destabilized aldehydes often favor temporary intramolecularity, this led to a comparison of the catalytic activity of several carbohydrates, and to experiments relevant in the prebiotic "origin of life" chemistry context. Studies on catalytic hydrolysis reactions of organophosphorous reagents are also presented, in which o-phthalaldehyde performs electrophilic activation of phosphinic amides, and other substrates possessing the P([double bond, length as m-dash]O)NH motif. Overall, this Feature article shows that aldehydes can be efficient catalysts in a variety of reactions, and highlights the efficiency of destabilized aldehydes such as formaldehyde and simple carbohydrates in this context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".