MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydrocarbon Generation Kinetics of a Heterogeneous Source Rock System: Example from the Lacsutrine Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Bay Basin, China

2017· article· en· W2767010790 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhuoheng Chen, Maowen Li, Tingting Cao, Xiaoxiao Ma, Zhiming Li, Qigui Jiang, Zheng Li, Chunqing Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsGeologySource rockStructural basinBayChinaGeochemistryBasin modellingHydrocarbon explorationPaleogenePaleontologyOceanographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Source rock heterogeneity is a common and important feature that requires attention in shale oil resource evaluation. The Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in the Jiyang Superbasin, Bohai Bay Basin, has been studied to investigate vertical variations in source rock characteristics and their thermal decomposition behaviors in relation to lacustrine shale oil resource potential. Fifty-four core samples from Luo 69 Well were analyzed using Rock-Eval 6 equipment, and the resulting FID (flame ionization detector) hydrocarbon pyrograms were examined to study their generation kinetics. Differences in bulk geochemical characteristics, petroleum generation capacities, and petrophysical properties allow for subdivision of the samples into three “homogeneous” groups: (a) a stratigraphically higher facies, corresponding to samples with HI value around 600 mg HC/g TOC and high S1/TOC (due to either exogenous hydrocarbon input or thermally less stable kerogen, or both); (b) stratigraphically a facies in the middle of the section, representing thermally more stable facies group with similar generation potential, but much lower S1/TOC; and (c) a stratigraphically lower facies, corresponding to source rock with low TOC (<2%) and HI (<350 mg HC/g TOC) and high S1/TOC, and thermally less stable organic matter. Such a grouping is consistent with a statistical classification by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the Rock-Eval data set. Bulk generation kinetic parameters from samples in the higher and lower stratigraphic groups seem to be affected by the high S1-associated heavy hydrocarbon residues in default S2 temperature regime. Although the unaffected samples in the middle of the section show “homogeneous” bulk geochemical characteristics in general, the temperature of onset (and offset) of major hydrocarbon generation can vary up to 15 °C among the samples, indicating a kinetically heterogeneous source rock. For a geothermal gradient of 30 °C/km, this translates to a difference of 500 m in burial depth for the onset of hydrocarbon generation for the same source rock unit in the extreme case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207