MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2767060554 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.366

[O3–11–04]: SERUM LONG‐CHAIN N‐3 FATTY ACID LEVELS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PRESYNAPTIC PROTEINS IN THE HUMAN BRAIN

2017· article· en· W2767060554 on OpenAlexaff
Ondine van de Rest, Dayan B. Goodenowe, William G. Honer, Martha Clare Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynaptophysinPlasmalogenDocosahexaenoic acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidInternal medicineEndocrinologySynaptotagmin 1PhosphatidylethanolamineBiologyChemistryBiochemistryFatty acidMedicinePhospholipidPhosphatidylcholineSynaptic vesicleImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood concentrations and intake of long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been associated with cognitive decline and the development of dementia. Animal models suggest that one mechanism underlying this relation may be neuroprotection of n-3 PUFAs against loss in synaptic proteins. We report here the first human study to relate serum n-3 PUFA levels to brain tissue levels of presynaptic proteins. This study is based on 57 deceased participants of the Memory and Aging Project who underwent brain autopsy. Presynaptic protein concentrations in the brain and n-3 PUFA serum levels over a mean of 3.6 years with on average 2.7 biochemical assessments were determined. Brain concentrations of eight presynaptic proteins (complexin I and II, Sept5, SNAP-25, synaptophysin, synaptotagmin, syntaxin, and VAMP) were measured with monoclonal antibodies and ELISA techniques in 12 brain regions. Presynaptic protein levels for each region were log-transformed, standardized, and averaged across regions. Serum n-3 PUFA concentrations were averaged and determined in total ethanolamine plasmalogen (PL) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) by mass spectrometry. Linear regression models adjusting for age at death, sex and education level were used to assess the associations. In adjusted models PE docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) had linear associations with synaptophysin (β=1.18; SE=0.58, P=0.05), VAMP (β=1.03; SE=0.45, P=0.03), and SNAP-25 (β=1.20; SE=0.57, P=0.04) and marginal associations with syntaxin (β=1.09; SE=0.58, P=0.07) and Sept5 (β=0.85; SE=0.45, P=0.06). PL DHA showed significant associations with higher levels of complexin I and II (β=0.55; SE=0.22, P=0.02 and β=0.66; SE=0.28, P=0.02 respectively) and marginal associations with syntaxin (β=0.39; SE=0.22, P=0.09) and VAMP (β=0.34; SE=0.18, P=0.06). PL eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) showed marginal linear associations with higher levels of synaptophysin (β=0.80; SE=0.43, P=0.07), synaptotagmin (β=0.68; SE=0.40, P=0.09), syntaxin (β=0.77; SE=0.43, P=0.08), VAMP (β=0.58; SE=0.34, P=0.10), SNAP-25 (β=0.73; SE=0.43, P=0.10), and Sept5 (β=0.63; SE=0.33, P=0.06). This study suggests that one potential biological mechanism underlying the relation of n-3 PUFAs, DHA in particular, to brain health during aging is maintenance of neural reserve by sustaining higher levels of presynaptic proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→