Cambios que se han dado en la política de seguridad interna en los Estados Unidos después del 9-11
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The September 11 attack on New York City to the Twin Towers and Pentagon in Washington, United States of America, was a worldwide impact event whose anticipated actions moved the entire political board, and endangered the hegemony of one of the most self-sufficient countries in the world (Barrie, 2006). The seriousness of the terrorist attacks of September 1, gave a way to a strong commitment of the United States to increase international cooperation against terrorism, and a number of measures were taken, such as: legal, military and political, which have been reinforced with the passage of time (Barrie, 2006). However, the contradictions and discrepancies in the country, has not allowed a common agreement to generate greater results in the fight against terrorism and has not been possible to reach a common strategy, which would be the only way out to end terrorism once and for all. The following research project aims to provide an analytical reading of the US national security policies are usually analyzed through realistic perspectives or by the realpolitik. On the other hand, we can show from this study, and a table of the main political ideologies in the United States, that social constructions, through these ideologies, have had a major influence in the actions and policies of American national security formulated after the attacks of the 9/11 (Barrie, 2006). From what could be observed in the accomplishment of the present work, it is concluded that in the administration of George W. Bush where the attacks of September 11 happened, in all the changes of national security that were made, social constructions and political ideologies had a significant impact (Barrie, 2006)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".