MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767399250 · doi:10.1080/08263663.2017.1378400

Reflections on injustice, inequality and land conflict in Colombia

2017· article· fr· W2767399250 on OpenAlexaff
Randall Berry

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Politics in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgrarian societyInjusticeDevelopment economicsEconomic JusticePopulationWage labourInequalityWageAsset (computer security)PovertyEconomicsLand tenureSociologyGeographyAgriculturePolitical scienceEconomic growthLabour economicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arguably the most defining characteristic of Colombia’s agrarian history has been the lack of justice in rural society. That lack has had a major negative impact on lower-income rural families (mainly small farmers and wage earners) by helping to make their land a vulnerable asset, subject to systematic misappropriation of one sort or another. Small farmers have also been victimized by a pervasive policy bias against them. The societal cost of these two historic injustices has taken many forms, most obviously death and displacement, loss of land, food insecurity and loss of income. Absent these injustices, the average income of the agricultural population of small farmers and wage earners would be an estimated two to three times higher than it now is. Under a healthy agrarian structure Colombia would almost certainly have been spared the bulk of the violence and suffering of the last half-century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbesSame topicHistory and Politics in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207