MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767604027 · doi:10.1109/ias.2017.8101722

State-of-charge estimation for li-ion battery using extended Kalman filter (EKF) and central difference Kalman filter (CDKF)

2017· article· en· W2767604027 on OpenAlexaff
Venu Sangwan, Rajesh Kumar, Akshay Kumar Rathore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterBattery (electricity)State of chargeControl theory (sociology)Kalman filterVoltageMean squared errorInvariant extended Kalman filterComputer scienceApproximation errorEngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmElectrical engineeringPower (physics)PhysicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A precise estimation of the state-of-charge (SOC) is of major importance in battery electric vehicles (BEVs) for prolonging the lifetime of the battery. Firstly, an equivalent circuit using the first-order RC for describing the dynamic behavior of the battery has been developed. Parameters of the battery are identified using the Ageist Spider Monkey Optimization (ASMO) technique. The optimization method uses the anticipated terminal voltage of the battery during operation and error between the anticipated and measured voltage for identification of parameters. The focus of this paper is the implementation of recursive estimation of battery SOC using extended Kalman filter (EKF) and Central Difference Kalman Filter (CDKF) approach. The estimation has an absolute root-mean-square error (RMSE) of less than 4% and an absolute maximum error less than 6% in all circumstances. The test results indicate that CDKF has good performance compared to EKF for the estimation of battery SOC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207