MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2767613513 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox168.036

ACTR-45. A PHASE 1, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF MARIZOMIB (MRZ) WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE (TMZ) AND RADIOTHERAPY (RT) IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WHO GRADE IV MALIGNANT GLIOMA (GLIOBLASTOMA, ndGBM)

2017· article· en· W2767613513 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela A. Bota, Warren Mason, Santosh Kesari, David Piccioni, Dawit Aregawi, Annick Desjardins, Benjamin Winograd, Steven D. Reich, Nancy K. Levin, Mohit Trikha

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcomitantMedicineTemozolomideNauseaGliomaInternal medicineVomitingInterim analysisTolerabilitySurgeryRadiation therapyAdverse effectGastroenterologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteasome inhibition sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ and RT, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for ndGBM. MRZ -- an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor with anti-glioma preclinical activity -- is being evaluated in ndGBM patients (NCT02903069). The phase 1 study (MRZ at 0.55, 0.7, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mg/m2) is accruing in separate concomitant (MRZ+TMZ+RT) and adjuvant (MRZ+RT) treatment cohorts (3 + 3 design), followed by dose-expansion at the recommended phase 2 dose in concomitant followed by adjuvant treatment cohorts. Concomitant treatment (42 days (D)): MRZ (10 min IV infusion) D1, 8, 15, 29, 36; RT total dose 60 Gy; TMZ (75 mg/m2, PO QD). Adjuvant treatment (28D-cycle): MRZ D1, 8, 15; TMZ (150–200 mg/m2, PO QDX5). Tumor response (RANO criteria) measured at beginning and end of concomitant treatment, and every other cycle during adjuvant treatment; MRZ and TMZ PK in concomitant treatment D1-2, 8–9. Mean age 55 yrs (60% male) for 20 patients in 14Apr2017 interim analysis (cohorts 1–3 have completed accrual in concomitant treatment, cohorts 1 and 2 have completed accrual and 2 patients are enrolled in adjuvant cohort 3); one DLT (fatigue) in the 0.7 mg/m2 adjuvant cohort. Most common treatment-related AEs (≥4 pts): fatigue, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, dizziness, hallucination; three Grade 3 SAEs (fatigue, hallucination, vomiting; all MRZ-related); two Grade 2 SAEs (nausea, confusional state, MRZ-related). Seventeen of the 20 patients included in this interim analysis remain on study: 7 of 9 concomitant patients are continuing in adjuvant treatment (longest beginning adjuvant cycle 7); of 11 adjuvant pts, two beginning cycle 9. The study is ongoing at 1.0 mg/m2 for both concomitant and adjuvant dose-escalation cohorts. Together the data demonstrate that the combination of MRZ with standard of care in ndGBM is well tolerated and may provide novel therapeutic benefit in this unmet need.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→