MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767767791 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.4336

Philosophie des sciences

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2767767791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement ÉconomiquesUniversity of TorontoJohns Hopkins UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityUniversity of CambridgeWayne State UniversityState University of New YorkStanford Bio-XStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La philosophie des sciences a pour objet la science ou, plus précisément, les diverses disciplines et pratiques scientifiques (voir Épistémologie). Il s’agit pour le philosophe des sciences d’analyser la formation, les modes d’évolution, les méthodes, la logique interne, les procédés d’invention et de justification de la connaissance scientifique dans toute la diversité de ses champs d’application. Sa tâche implique un intérêt particulier pour l’interrelation des disciplines scientifiques, ai...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it