8th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment & Prevention 19-22 July 2015, Vancouver, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Sensitive assays are needed for detection of residual HIV in patients with undetectable plasma viral loads to determine if eradication strategies are effective. The gold standard quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) underestimates the magnitude of the viral reservoir, while sensitive PCR-based assays lack the ability to distinguish replication competent from defective virus. We sought to determine whether xenograft of leukocytes from HIV-1 infected patients with undetectable plasma viral loads into severely immunocompromised mice would result in viral amplification and measurable viral loads within the aberrant murine host. Methods We evaluated whether xenograft of 1) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from five HIV-1+ patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), 2) PBMCs or purified resting CD4+ T cells from 5 HIV-1+ elite suppressors (ES), or 3) PBMCs from a Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV)+ pigtailed macaque on suppressive ART, all with undetectable plasma viral loads, into NOD. Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice resulted in viral amplification in the mouse. Successful xenograft of mice was confirmed by flow cytometry. Human CD8+ T cells were depleted in humanized mice with depleting antibody, and CD4+ T cells were activated in a subset of mice with activating anti-CD3. Plasma viral loads in xenografted mice were quantified using qRT-PCR, and compared to plasma viral load and QVOA results from the human or macaque donor. Results With this murine viral outgrowth assay (MVOA), we amplified HIV-1 from all 10 HIV+ subjects with undetectable plasma viral load, including an ES from whom we were unable to recover virus by QVOA. We detected HIV in mice an average of 20 days after xenograft with PBMCs from patients on suppressive ART, and an average of 28 days after xenograft with PBMCs or resting CD4+ T cells from ES. For two of the mice xenografted with CD4+ T cells from ES, we detected HIV only after activation with anti-CD3. We similarly detected SIV in macaquized mice by seven days post-xenograft. Conclusions The MVOA has the potential to serve as a powerful tool to identify residual HIV-1 in patients with undetectable viral loads, such as those who have undergone promising cure therapies. Abstract MOAA0101–Figure 1. MVOA for detection of residual virus. 10.7448/IAS.18.5.20320 © 2015 Pate K M et al; licensee International AIDS Society Published 22 July 2015 Presenting author email: [email protected]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.178 | 0.087 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".