MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768096823 · doi:10.1109/tnet.2019.2926230

SHIP: A Scalable High-Performance IPv6 Lookup Algorithm That Exploits Prefix Characteristics

2019· preprint· en· W2768096823 on OpenAlexafffund
Thibaut Stimpfling, Normand Bélanger, J. M. Pierre Langlois, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTriePrefixScalabilityParallel computingIPv6Data structureLatency (audio)ExploitTree traversalAlgorithmOperating systemThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the emergence of new network applications, current IP lookup engines must support high bandwidth, low lookup latency, and the ongoing growth of IPv6 networks. However, the existing solutions are not designed to address jointly these three requirements. This paper introduces SHIP, an IPv6 lookup algorithm that exploits prefix characteristics to build a data structure designed to meet future application requirements. Based on the prefix length distribution and prefix density, prefixes are first clustered into groups sharing similar characteristics and then encoded in hybrid trie-trees. The resulting memory-efficient and scalable data structure can be stored in low-latency memories and allows the traversal process to be parallelized and pipelined in order to support high packet bandwidth in hardware. In addition, SHIP supports incremental updates. Evaluated on real and synthetic IPv6 prefix tables, SHIP has a logarithmic scaling factor in terms of the number of memory accesses and a linear memory consumption scaling. Compared with other well-known approaches, SHIP reduces the required amount of memory per prefix by 87%. When implemented on a state-of-the-art field-programmable gate array (FPGA), the proposed architecture can support processing 588 million packets per second.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ACM Transactions on NetworkingSame topicNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207