MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seismic Retrofitting of Rectangular Bridge Piers with Deficient Lap Splices Using Ultrahigh-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete

2017· article· en· W2768256363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bridge Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsCIMA+ (Canada)Royal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringSpallRetrofittingDowelStirrupDuctility (Earth science)PierRebarMaterials scienceFiber-reinforced concreteFailure mode and effects analysisPrecast concretespliceEngineeringComposite materialReinforced concreteCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of an innovative retrofitting method using ultrahigh-performance fiber- concrete (UHPFRC) was investigated experimentally on RC bridge piers with deficient lap splice details. The objective is to study the performance of the proposed retrofitting technique for eliminating the bond failure mode in lap splice regions of rectangular columns with a cross-sectional aspect ratio exceeding 2. The strengthening technique consists of substituting the normal concrete around lapped bars in the splice region by UHPFRC. The test program includes unidirectional reverse cyclic tests conducted on five rehabilitated and one control rectangular large-scale specimens. The longitudinal reinforcement ratio ranged from 1.30 to 1.67% with bar diameters (db) equal to 25, 30, 35, and 45 mm. A splice length at the column base of 24db and stirrup spacing of 300 mm were used for all specimens to replicate column design practice before the introduction of modern seismic design specifications. The selected self-compacting UHPFRC mix contained 234 kg/m3 (3% by volume) of 10 × 0.20-mm straight fibers. The failure of all retrofitted specimens was progressive and ductile because they all failed due to the successive rupture of the dowel bars in the footing at a very high displacement ductility ratio. The lapped splice splitting failure mode was eliminated, whereas no longitudinal bar buckled. The UHPFRC cover integrity contributed to eliminate all failure modes associated with concrete damage (crushing, spalling). Recommendations for applying the proposed technique to deficient column rehabilitation are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it