MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768261558 · doi:10.20431/2347-3134.0509006

Northanger Abbey: Jane Austen’s Connexion with Ann Radcliffe and the Gothic

2017· article· en· W2768261558 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Austen, Cynthia Whissell, Ann Radcliffe

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyVisual artsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ann Radcliffe and Jane Austen each wrote a "gothic" novel near the end of the 18 th century.The Mysteries of Udolpho was published in 1794 and Northanger Abbey, written beginning in the 1790s, was published after Austen's death in 1818.Each novel tells the tale of an isolated young woman at the mercy of a domineering older male figure in a grand and frightening mansion.Each young heroine faces her fears, finds the most egregious of them to be groundless, and marries the young man of her choice.Northanger makes several direct references to Udolpho, 1 and the connection between the two novels has been noted by authors treating the gothic genre (e.g., Skinner, 2013; Wallace, 1988).Udolpho was an extremely successful novel and it was widely read in its day (Howard, 2001); Northanger continues to be widely read today as a part of the Austen opus.According to the Google Ngram Viewer®, which searches millions of books for the occurrence of words, phrases, or titles, The Mysteries of Udolpho is mentioned more frequently in publications issued between the novel's first appearance in 1794 and 1872, while Northanger Abbey is mentioned more frequently from 1887 onwards. 2 It is frequently suggested that Udolpho is a gothic masterpiece while Northanger is a parody of the genre (e.g., Lenckos, 2010; Rehn, 2014).Parody involves the comic retelling and transformation of a text in a manner designed to promote critical thinking, both about the parodied text and about the parody itself (Hannoosh, 1989).Benét's Reader's Encyclopedia (1987, p. 738) defines parody as "a comic or satirical imitation of a piece of writing, exaggerating its style and content, and playing especially on any weakness in the structure or meaning of the original."Word® and Google® offer "mockery" as a synonym of "parody."Was mockery Austen's main aim in writing Northanger Abbey?Freeman (1963) suggests that parody might focus on ridiculing a well-known work, or that it might instead take a "positive and constructive" approach that creates new meaning by reading an existing work in a creative manner (p.307).Gothic romances deal with emotional settings and emotional conflicts (isolated maidens, grand vistas, forbidding castles, ghosts), often dwelling on them to an extreme degree.If Udolpho is a gothic masterpiece, and Northanger is a parody of the 1 There are a total of 18 references to Udolpho in Northanger, mainly in conversations held between Catherine Moreland and Isabella Thorpe, Catherine and John Thorpe, and Catherine and Henry Tilney.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on Studies in English Language and LiteratureSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207