Northanger Abbey: Jane Austen’s Connexion with Ann Radcliffe and the Gothic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
a "gothic" novel near the end of the 18 th century. The Mysteries of Udolpho was published in 1794 and Northanger Abbey, written beginning in the 1790s, was published after Austen's death in 1818. Each novel tells the tale of an isolated young woman at the mercy of a domineering older male figure in a grand and frightening mansion. Each young heroine faces her fears, finds the most egregious of them to be groundless, and marries the young man of her choice. Northanger makes several direct references to Udolpho, 1 and the connection between the two novels has been noted by authors treating the gothic genre (e.g., Skinner, 2013; Wallace, 1988). Udolpho was an extremely successful novel and it was widely read in its day (Howard, 2001); Northanger continues to be widely read today as a part of the Austen opus. According to the Google Ngram Viewer, which searches millions of books for the occurrence of words, phrases, or titles, The Mysteries of Udolpho is mentioned more frequently in publications issued between the novel's first appearance in 1794 and 1872, while Northanger Abbey is mentioned more frequently from 1887 onwards. Parody involves the comic retelling and transformation of a text in a manner designed to promote critical thinking, both about the parodied text and about the parody itself (Hannoosh, 1989). Bent's Reader's Encyclopedia (1987, p. 738) defines parody as "a comic or satirical imitation of a piece of writing, exaggerating its style and content, and playing especially on any weakness in the structure or meaning of the original." Word and Google offer "mockery" as a synonym of "parody." Was mockery Austen's main aim in writing Northanger Abbey? Freeman (1963) suggests that parody might focus on ridiculing a well-known work, or that it might instead take a "positive and constructive" approach that creates new meaning by reading an existing work in a creative manner (p. 307). Gothic romances deal with emotional settings and emotional conflicts (isolated maidens, grand vistas, forbidding castles, ghosts), often dwelling on them to an extreme degree. If Udolpho is a gothic masterpiece, and Northanger is a parody of the 1 There are a total of 18 references to Udolpho in Northanger, mainly in conversations held between Catherine Moreland and Isabella Thorpe, Catherine and John Thorpe, and Catherine and Henry Tilney.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".