Oculomotor Executive Dysfunction during the Early and Later Stages of Sport-Related Concussion Recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Executive dysfunction represents the most persistent sequela of mild traumatic brain injury. It is, however, largely unclear whether a sport-related concussion similarly contributes to a persistent executive dysfunction even when an athlete has been cleared medically for return to play. Here, individuals with a diagnosis of a sport-related concussion-and their age- and sex-matched controls-completed an oculomotor assessment during the acute and later stages of injury recovery. Prosaccades (i.e., saccade to a target) and executive-related antisaccades (i.e., saccade mirror-symmetrical to a target) were completed: (1) 2-6 days after a concussive event (initial assessment), and (2) 14-20 days after the initial oculomotor assessment when individuals were cleared for return to play (follow-up assessment). At the initial assessment, the concussed group produced antisaccade reaction times (RT) that were 93 ms longer than the control group (p < 0.001), whereas prosaccade RTs did not differ between groups (p = 0.25). At the follow-up assessment, concussed and control groups produced comparable pro- and antisaccade RTs (ps >0.31); however, the former group exhibited a continued increase in directional errors (p < 0.05). That initial assessment antisaccades-but not prosaccades-differed between groups indicates that the acute recovery of a concussion is associated with a selective executive-related oculomotor deficit, and the continued increase in directional errors at the follow-up assessment suggests that such a deficit persists even when an athlete has been cleared medically for return to play. The antisaccade task may therefore serve to assess subtle executive deficits and determine when an athlete may return to play safely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".