MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768385603 · doi:10.1097/wnp.0000000000000436

Comparison of Heart Rate Variability Parameters to the Autonomic Reflex Screen in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

2017· article· en· W2768385603 on OpenAlex
Jacquie Baker, Juan Manuel Racosta, Kurt Kimpinski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart rate variabilityHeart rateBlood pressureContext (archaeology)Internal medicineCardiologyOrthostatic vital signsTachycardiaReflexAutonomic nervous systemDiaphragmatic breathingAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The clinical significance of heart rate variability (HRV) in the context of autonomic dysfunction continues to be a matter of debate. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the clinical relevance of HRV in the context of autonomic dysfunction. METHODS: Heart rate variability data from 225 volunteers consisting of controls (n = 166) and patients with mild (n = 25) and severe (n = 34) autonomic dysfunction were retrospectively analyzed. Time and frequency parameters were correlated against baseline and standardized tests of autonomic function. RESULTS: During baseline, resting HR was negatively correlated with time (SD of all normal RR interval, r = -0.511; RMSSD, r = -0.585; pNN50, r = -0.545) and frequency (low-frequency, r = -0.362; high-frequency, r = -0.421) parameters (P < 0.01). Resting systolic blood pressure demonstrated similar significant correlations (P < 0.01). During head-up tilt, SD of all normal RR intervals was positively correlated with [INCREMENT]HR and change in systolic blood pressure (r = 0.340; r = 0.538, respectively; P < 0.01). Similarly, low-frequency, high-frequency, and low-frequency/high-frequency ratios were correlated with [INCREMENT]HR (r = 0.422, r = 0.176, r = 0.470) and change in systolic blood pressure (r = 0.451, r = 0.407, and r = 0.185) (P < 0.01). Time parameters (SD of all normal RR intervals, RMSSD, and pNN50) were all significantly correlated with deep breathing (r = 0.600; r = 0.556; r = 0.516; P < 0.01, respectively). Low-frequency and high-frequency power were also correlated (r = 0.596; r = 0.580, respectively) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Time and frequency parameters showed significant negative correlations with baseline hemodynamics. During a test of sympathetic activation and parasympathetic withdrawal, this relationship shifted to reveal significant positive correlations between HRV parameters and hemodynamics. Last, during a test of parasympathetic activation, there were significant positive correlations with cardiovagally mediated HRV parameters. Overall, these results suggest broader clinical relevance for HRV parameters within the spectrum of autonomic functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it