MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2768449501 · doi:10.1121/1.5014901

Underwater sound propagation variability over the Chukchi Sea continental slope

2017· article· en· W2768449501 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ying-Tsong Lin, Weifeng G. Zhang, Timothy F. Duda, Megan S. Ballard, Jason D. Sagers, Mohsen Badiey, Peter F. Worcester, Sean Pecknold

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyContinental shelfOceanographyMesoscale meteorologyUpwellingInternal tideSound (geography)Stratification (seeds)ThermoclineWaves and shallow waterClimatologyInternal wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Canada Basin and Chukchi Sea regions, a vertical sound duct can be formed between the Pacific Summer Water Layer on the top and the Atlantic Water Layer on the bottom, providing an acoustic pathway connecting the deep basin and the shallow shelf over the Chukchi Sea continental slope. Previous studies have shown that the shelfbreak circulation (specifically upwelling), the sub-mesoscale eddies spun off the shelfbreak jet, and the ice coverage are the three major causes of the temporal and spatial variability of the Pacific Summer Water Layer in the region. In this paper, numerical simulations utilizing the Parabolic-Equation (PE) method are conducted to investigate the sound propagation variability over the Chukchi Sea shelfbreak and slope, along with an idealized ocean circulation model providing the fundamental basis of water-column fluctuations. The sound pressure sensitivity kernel derived from the acoustic propagator in the PE method is also used to provide physical insights into the sound propagation variability. The acoustic data over the northern Chukchi Sea shelfbreak collected during the 2016 shallow water cruise of the Canada Basin Acoustic Propagation Experiment will be examined and compared with the numerical simulations. [Work supported by the Office of Naval Research.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→