MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768506483 · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfx130

Nephrotic syndrome and adrenal insufficiency caused by a variant in SGPL1

2017· article· en· W2768506483 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Natália D. Linhares, Rodrigo Rezende Arantes, Stanley de Almeida Araújo, Sérgio D.J. Pena

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Kidney Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsNephrotic syndromePrimary Adrenal InsufficiencyAdrenal insufficiencyMedicineAdrenocortical InsufficiencyDiseasePediatricsBioinformaticsInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of congenital nephrotic syndrome in association with primary adrenal insufficiency. Most recently, three groups found concurrently the underlying genetic defect in the gene sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1 (SGPL1) and called the disease nephrotic syndrome type 14 (NPHS14). In this report we have performed whole-exome sequencing and identified a new homozygous variant in SGPL1, p.Arg340Trp, in a girl with nephrotic syndrome and Addison's disease. Her brother died previously with the same phenotype and hyperpigmentation of the skin. We reviewed the reported cases and concluded that NPHS14 is a clinically recognizable syndrome. The discovery of this syndrome may contribute to the diagnosis and description of additional patients who could benefit from treatment, genetic counseling and screening for related comorbidities. Until now, patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome associated with primary adrenal insufficiency have been treated as having two different diseases; however, the treatment for patients with NPHS14 should be unique, possibly targeting the sphingolipid metabolism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Kidney JournalSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207