Bibliographic record
Abstract
In our time, bodies have become alienated from one another on the basis of race and ethnicity, gender and sex, and religion. To envision theologically a political posture with which to disrupt these paradigmatic structures, this essay develops a model of a politics of love based on Galatians 3:26–28, where Paul argues for “putting on” Christ in whom there is no longer Jew or Greek, slave or free, male and female (NRSV). “Putting on” serves as a reminder of a rite-act via which forms of queering identities disperse bodies away from dominant magnetic centres for the purpose of bringing to awareness and renouncing the limit as an alienating end, and announcing its potential for new kindred beginnings toward peacefulness. This essay offers a Galatian response to the current political situation in light of Gloria Anzaldúa's embodiment of the borders between the United States and Mexico, and Judith Butler's concept of parody that by exposing the normative by means of disguise can result in pastiche or the subversive mimicry of history. The essay also draws from border theory and queer theory to reframe Jean-Luc Nancy's analysis of “being-with” that for him is central to the inquiry on being human in community. It aims at offering a brief theological and philosophical roadmap to dwelling in solidarity, bodily and affectively, for the purposes of making peace. Living according to Galatians 3:26–28 demonstrates how revolutionary axes can extend oneself to the limits, denounce fragmenting practices, be affected by the alienated bodies of modern production, and mend what has been violently split apart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".