MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768882118 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00534.2017

Flow-mediated dilation stimulated by sustained increases in shear stress: A useful tool for assessing endothelial function in humans?

2017· review· en· W2768882118 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua C. Tremblay, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)Queen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasodilationMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionShear stressStimulus (psychology)Reactive hyperemiaInternal medicineCardiologyEndotheliumBrachial arteryBlood pressurePsychologyMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigations of human conduit artery endothelial function via flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) have largely been restricted to the reactive hyperemia (RH) technique, wherein a transient increase in shear stress after the release of limb occlusion stimulates upstream conduit artery vasodilation (RH-FMD). FMD can also be assessed in response to sustained increases in shear stress [sustained stimulus (SS)-FMD], most often created with limb heating or exercise. Exercise in particular creates a physiologically relevant stimulus because shear stress increases, and FMD occurs, during typical day-to-day activity. Several studies have identified that various conditions and acute interventions have a disparate impact on RH-FMD versus SS-FMD, sometimes with only the latter demonstrating impairment. Indeed, evidence suggests that transient (RH) and sustained (SS) shear stress stimuli may be transduced via different signaling pathways, and, as such, SS-FMD and RH-FMD appear to offer unique insights regarding endothelial function. The present review describes the techniques used to assess SS-FMD and summarizes the evidence regarding 1) SS-FMD as an index of endothelial function in humans, highlighting comparisons with RH-FMD, and 2) potential differences in shear stress transduction and vasodilator production stimulated by transient versus sustained shear stress stimuli. The evidence suggests that SS-FMD is a useful tool to assess endothelial function and that further research is required to characterize the mechanisms involved and its association with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sustained increases in peripheral conduit artery shear stress, created via distal skin heating or exercise, provide a physiologically relevant stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Sustained stimulus FMD and FMD stimulated by transient, reactive hyperemia-induced increases in shear stress provide distinct assessments of conduit artery endothelial function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207