Flow-mediated dilation stimulated by sustained increases in shear stress: A useful tool for assessing endothelial function in humans?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigations of human conduit artery endothelial function via flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) have largely been restricted to the reactive hyperemia (RH) technique, wherein a transient increase in shear stress after the release of limb occlusion stimulates upstream conduit artery vasodilation (RH-FMD). FMD can also be assessed in response to sustained increases in shear stress [sustained stimulus (SS)-FMD], most often created with limb heating or exercise. Exercise in particular creates a physiologically relevant stimulus because shear stress increases, and FMD occurs, during typical day-to-day activity. Several studies have identified that various conditions and acute interventions have a disparate impact on RH-FMD versus SS-FMD, sometimes with only the latter demonstrating impairment. Indeed, evidence suggests that transient (RH) and sustained (SS) shear stress stimuli may be transduced via different signaling pathways, and, as such, SS-FMD and RH-FMD appear to offer unique insights regarding endothelial function. The present review describes the techniques used to assess SS-FMD and summarizes the evidence regarding 1) SS-FMD as an index of endothelial function in humans, highlighting comparisons with RH-FMD, and 2) potential differences in shear stress transduction and vasodilator production stimulated by transient versus sustained shear stress stimuli. The evidence suggests that SS-FMD is a useful tool to assess endothelial function and that further research is required to characterize the mechanisms involved and its association with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sustained increases in peripheral conduit artery shear stress, created via distal skin heating or exercise, provide a physiologically relevant stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Sustained stimulus FMD and FMD stimulated by transient, reactive hyperemia-induced increases in shear stress provide distinct assessments of conduit artery endothelial function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".