Synthesis, Structures, and Redox Properties of Tetracyano-Bridged Diferrocene Donor–Acceptor–Donor Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of tetracyanobutadiene (TCBD)- and dicyanoquinodimethane (DCNQ)-bridged ferrocenyl dimers 5 – 8 were designed and synthesized by the [2 + 2] cycloaddition–retroelectrocyclization reaction of diferrocenyl complexes 3 and 4 with tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) and 7,7,8,8 tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), respectively. The effect of constitutional isomers (para vs meta) and different acceptors on their donor–acceptor interactions and photophysical and redox properties as well as electronic structures was evaluated using a variety of experimental and theoretical methods. The single-crystal X-ray structures of TCBD- and DCNQ-bridged ferrocenyl dimers 6 and 7 are reported. The DCNQ-bridged ferrocenyl dimers 7 and 8 have lower HOMO–LUMO gap values with red-shifted absorption bands in comparison to those of TCBD-bridged ferrocenyl dimers 5 and 6 . Mössbauer spectra of 3 – 8 are suggestive of very similar isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings in all diferrocene complexes despite their different proximities to the electron-withdrawing fragment. Spectroelectrochemical data on 5 – 8 are suggestive of the presence of ferrocene-centered HOMOs in these compounds as well as a lack of electronic coupling between ferrocene groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".