Exercise-induced Fatigue in Severe Hypoxia after an Intermittent Hypoxic Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exercise-induced central fatigue is alleviated after acclimatization to high altitude. The adaptations underpinning this effect may also be induced with brief, repeated exposures to severe hypoxia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether (i) exercise tolerance in severe hypoxia would be improved after an intermittent hypoxic (IH) protocol and (ii) exercise-induced central fatigue would be alleviated after an IH protocol. METHODS: Nineteen recreationally active men were randomized into two groups who completed ten 2-h exposures in severe hypoxia (IH: partial pressure of inspired O2 82 mm Hg; n = 11) or normoxia (control; n = 8). Seven sessions involved cycling for 30 min at 25% peak power (W˙peak) in IH and at a matched heart rate in normoxia. Participants performed baseline constant-power cycling to task failure in severe hypoxia (TTF-Pre). After the intervention, the cycling trial was repeated (TTF-Post). Before and after exercise, responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation and supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation were obtained to assess central and peripheral contributions to neuromuscular fatigue. RESULTS: From pre- to postexercise in TTF-Pre, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), cortical voluntary activation (VATMS), and potentiated twitch force (Qtw,pot) decreased in both groups (all P < 0.05). After IH, TTF-Post was improved (535 ± 213 s vs 713 ± 271 s, P < 0.05) and an additional isotime trial was performed. After the IH intervention only, the reduction in MVC and VATMS was attenuated at isotime (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body exercise tolerance in severe hypoxia was prolonged after a protocol of IH. This may be related to an alleviation of the central contribution to neuromuscular fatigue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".