Structural and magnetic characterization of Mn/NiFe bilayers with ion-beam-assisted deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The exchange bias effect in ferromagnetic (FM)/antiferromagnetic (AF) bilayer structures has been widely investigated because its underlying principle is critical for spintronic applications. In this work, the effect of Ar + beam bombardment on the microstructural and magnetic properties of the Mn/NiFe thin films was investigated. The in-situ Ar + bombardment nontrivially promoted the Mn/NiFe intermixing and facilitated the formation of the FeMn phase, accompanied by a remarkable reduction of Mn and NiFe layer thickness. The enhanced Mn/NiFe intermixing greatly disordered the interfacial spins, inhibiting the interfacial exchange coupling and giving rise to a significant decrease of the exchange bias field ( H ex ). The facilitated Mn/NiFe intermixing effect also dramatically degraded the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the NiFe crystallites, leading to a notable suppression of the coercivity ( H c ). These results indicate that both the exchange bias and coercivity of the Mn/NiFe bilayers can be directly affected by the in-situ Ar + bombardment, offering an effective way to modify the magnetism of the exchange-bias systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".