Housing Transformation in Port St Johns, South Africa Since 1994.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study reports on the results of an investigation on housing transformation in Port St Johns, South Africa between 1994 and 2010. The objectives for this study are to: review relevant information on housing policy framework in South Africa; examine housing delivery and the desegregation of the different population groups; and identify constraints towards housing delivery and desegregation in the town. The empirical data for the study was obtained from Port St Johns’ property registers, through individual interviews with key role players of Port St Johns’ urban spatial planning, people involved in the property industry, and long-term residents of the town. The findings indicate that in 1994 housing delivery was stagnant and segregation high. Although marginal, by 2010 housing delivery for low-income groups, and desegregating of property ownership have also made some step. Encouraging Black property ownership through housing delivery was constrained by the underperformance of local municipal leadership and urban variations of government funding for development proj ects. Obstacles to desegregation were overpriced houses, low housing market, poor infrastructure and housing properties without title deeds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".