MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reduction Kinetics of Ilmenite Ore for Pressurized Chemical Looping Combustion of Simulated Natural Gas

2017· article· en· W2769572001 on OpenAlexafffund
Yewen Tan, Firas N. Ridha, Dennis Lu, Robin W. Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsIlmenitePartial pressureChemical looping combustionCombustionChemistryOxygenCarbon dioxideMethaneThermogravimetric analysisHydrocarbonPropaneAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reduction kinetics of ilmenite ore as an oxygen carrier for the chemical looping combustion of a simulated natural gas mixture under elevated pressure was studied using a pressurized thermogravimetric analyzer (PTGA). The fuel gas is a mixture of hydrocarbon, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen to simulate an actual combustion environment. The oxidation phase of the experiments was carried out in air. Effects of temperature (1023–1223 K), total pressure (0.6–1.6 MPa), fuel partial pressure (0.126–0.34 MPa), and CO 2 partial pressure (pFuel/pCO 2 = 0.5–1) were studied. The results showed that the presence of small amounts of ethane and propane clearly led to a higher ilmenite reactivity at temperatures below 1123 K, but this effect became less significant as temperature increased and completely disappeared above 1123 K. The results also showed that increasing CO 2 partial pressure had little effect on ilmenite conversion rate, though it did have some slightly negative influence on ilmenite oxygen carrying capacity that was especially noticeable at lower total pressure. A higher fuel partial pressure appeared to have a slightly negative impact on ilmenite oxygen carrying capacity, especially at higher temperature. A kinetic model based on a phase-boundary controlled mechanism with contracting sphere was developed by incorporating the total pressure, fuel and CO 2 partial pressures, and temperature, and it was able to satisfactorily reproduce most of the test results with a conversion ratio of up to 70%. This model predicted that the ilmenite conversion rate had a strong positive correlation with the temperature and fuel partial pressure, and a relatively weaker negative correlation with the total pressure and CO 2 partial pressures. Overall conversion rate will increase when total pressure increases, which justify the pressurized chemical looping combustion technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207