MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769600917 · doi:10.1136/vetreccr-2017-000540

Emphysematous gastritis associated with <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> type A in a cat

2017· article· en· W2769600917 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessica B. Burn, Nicolas Rousset, Debra W Henderson, Carolyn Legge, Francisco A. Uzal

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryBritish Columbia Rehabilitation Foundation
FundersUniversity of CalgaryPfizer
KeywordsMedicineLethargyClostridium perfringensEnteritisGastroenterologyGastritisStomachInternal medicineNecrosisPathologyGastric distensionGastrointestinal diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ten‐year‐old male neutered Maine Coon cat was presented with lethargy, weakness, dehydration and inappetence of 48 hours' duration. Initial ultrasound revealed gastric distension, a normal gastric wall and segmental circumferential thickening of the jejunum wall. The cat initially improved with supportive care, but deteriorated on the second day of hospitalisation. Repeat ultrasound examination and radiography 24 hours after presentation showed marked gastric wall thickening with emphysematous changes. At gastroscopy, severe gastric mucosal discoloration was seen, suggestive of necrosis. Euthanasia was performed post‐gastroscopy due to the deteriorating clinical signs and a suspicion of generalised gastric wall necrosis. Postmortem examination and results of ancillary tests confirmed moderate necrosuppurative and emphysematous gastritis, and focal, mild, necrosuppurative and emphysematous enteritis associated with Clostridium perfringens type A infection. C perfringens infection is rare in small animals; however, it can cause severe and sometimes fatal gastrointestinal disease if the bacteria invade and colonise the gastrointestinal wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicBiliary and Gastrointestinal FistulasFrench-language works237,207