MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769718726 · doi:10.1162/dram_r_00704

Obstruction

2017· article· en· W2769718726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Hurley

Bibliographic record

VenueTDR/The Drama Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)DramaAffect theoryFeelingArtMedia studiesSociologyArt historyVisual artsPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

December 01 2017 Obstruction Obstruction. By NickSalvato. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016; 280 pp.; illustrations. $89.95 cloth, $24.95 paper, e-book available. Erin Hurley Erin Hurley Erin Hurley is Professor of English at McGill University; her research engages contemporary performance in Québec, minority-language artistic practice, affect studies, and feminist theatre studies. Among her affect-interested publications are Theatre and Feeling (Palgrave, 2010), Theatres of Affect (Playwrights Canada Press, 2014), and a special dossier of the Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism (2012) on “Affect/Performance/Politics,” coedited with Sara Warner. erin.hurley@mcgill.ca Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Erin Hurley Erin Hurley is Professor of English at McGill University; her research engages contemporary performance in Québec, minority-language artistic practice, affect studies, and feminist theatre studies. Among her affect-interested publications are Theatre and Feeling (Palgrave, 2010), Theatres of Affect (Playwrights Canada Press, 2014), and a special dossier of the Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism (2012) on “Affect/Performance/Politics,” coedited with Sara Warner. erin.hurley@mcgill.ca Online Issn: 1531-4715 Print Issn: 1054-2043 ©2017 Erin Hurley2017Erin Hurley TDR/The Drama Review (2017) 61 (4 (236)): 169–170. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_r_00704 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Erin Hurley; Obstruction. TDR/The Drama Review 2017; 61: 4 (236), 169–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_r_00704 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsTDR/The Drama Review Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. ©2017 Erin Hurley2017Erin Hurley Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTDR/The Drama ReviewSame topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207