MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769746787 · doi:10.1107/s2056989017016498

Formation and structural characterization of a europium(II) mono(scorpionate) complex and a sterically crowded pyrazabole

2017· article· en· W2769746787 on OpenAlexaff
Phil Liebing, Marcel Kühling, Josef Takats, Liane Hilfert, Frank T. Edelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteric effectsEuropiumCharacterization (materials science)ChemistryStereochemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of EuI 2 (THF) 2 with potassium hydrotris(3,5-diisopropylpyrazolyl)borate (K[HB(3,5- i Pr2 pz) 3 ] (= KTp i Pr2 , pz = pyrazolyl) in a molar ratio of 1:1.5 resulted in extensive ligand fragmentation and formation of the europium(II) mono(scorpionate) complex bis(3,5-diisopropyl-1 H -pyrazole)[hydrotris(3,5-diisopropylpyrazolyl)borato]iodidoeuropium(II), [Eu(C 27 H 46 BN 6 )I(C 9 H 16 N 2 ) 2 ] or (Tp i Pr2 )(3,5- i Pr2 pzH) 2 Eu II I, 1 , in high yield (78%). As a typical by-product, small amounts of the sterically crowded pyrazabole derivative trans -4,8-bis(3,5-diisopropylpyrazol-1-yl)-1,3,5,7-tetraisopropylpyrazabole, C 36 H 62 B 2 H 8 or trans -{(3,5- i Pr2 pz)HB(μ-3,5- i Pr2 pz)} 2 , 2 , were formed. Both title compounds have been structurally characterized through single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In 1 , two isopropyl groups are each disordered over two orientations with occupancy ratios of 0.574 (10):0.426 (10) and 0.719 (16):0.281 (16). In 2 , one isopropyl group is similarly disordered, occupancy ratio 0.649 (9):0.351 (9).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207