Abstract 367: Extreme High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Genetics: An Assortment of Large and Small Polygenic Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale: Although HDL-C levels are known to have a complex genetic basis, most studies have focused solely on identifying rare variants with large phenotypic effects to explain extreme HDL-C phenotypes. Objective: Here we concurrently evaluate the contribution of both rare and common genetic variants, as well as large-scale copy number variations (CNVs), towards extreme HDL-C concentrations. Methods: In clinically ascertained patients with low ( N =136) and high ( N =119) HDL-C profiles, we applied our targeted next-generation sequencing panel (LipidSeq TM ) to sequence genes involved in HDL metabolism, which were subsequently screened for rare variants and CNVs. We also developed a novel polygenic trait score (PTS) to assess patients’ genetic accumulations of common variants that have been shown by genome-wide association studies to associate primarily with HDL-C levels. Two additional cohorts of patients with extremely low and high HDL-C (total N =1,746 and N =1,139, respectively) were used for PTS validation. Results: In the discovery cohort, 32.4% of low HDL-C patients carried rare variants or CNVs in primary ( ABCA1 , APOA1 , LCAT ) and secondary ( LPL , LMF1 , GPD1 , APOE ) HDL-C–altering genes. Additionally, 13.4% of high HDL-C patients carried rare variants or CNVs in primary ( SCARB1 , CETP , LIPC , LIPG ) and secondary ( APOC3 , ANGPTL4 ) HDL-C–altering genes. For polygenic effects, patients with abnormal HDL-C profiles but without rare variants or CNVs were ~2-fold more likely to have an extreme PTS compared to normolipidemic individuals, indicating an increased frequency of common HDL-C–associated variants in these patients. Similar results in the two validation cohorts demonstrate that this novel PTS successfully quantifies common variant accumulation, further characterizing the polygenic basis for extreme HDL-C phenotypes. Conclusions: Patients with extreme HDL-C levels have various combinations of rare variants, common variants, or CNVs driving their phenotypes. Fully characterizing the genetic basis of HDL-C levels must extend to encompass multiple types of genetic determinants—not just rare variants—to further our understanding of this complex, controversial quantitative trait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".