MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769865208 · doi:10.33679/rfn.v5i10.1560

La unión de grupos ambientalistas en el proceso de negociación del tratado de libre comercio

2017· article· es· W2769865208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Regina Barba Pírez

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontera norte · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicClimate Change Policy and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n número importante de organizaciones ambientalistas de la sociedad civil mexicana, ocupadas y preocupadas por el medio ambiente, y concientes de que no existen fronteras ecológicas entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá, participó con propuestas concretas desde que se anunció la decisión de iniciar las negociaciones de un Tratado de Libre Comercio (TLC). El objetivo de esta organización ha sido persuadir a los negociadores de que se incluyan disposiciones suficientes para prevenir que el gran aumento, tanto en la actividad económica como en el intercambio comercial de bienes y servicios, así como el incremento que para todo ello se requiere en la explotación de recursos naturales, no tenga efectos dañinos sobre el medio ambiente y la preservación de la riqueza natural de los tres países.México atraviesa por una crítica situación de perturbaciones negativas ambientales, por este motivo, lejos de limitarnos a advertir dichos peligros, los integrantes de la Unión de Grupos Ambientalistas (IAP) (formada por 33 grupos) estamos convencidos de que el TLC deberá ponerse en práctica sólo en la medida en que garantice la protección del ambiente y la calidad de vida de los individuos. En este trabajo se aborda, de manera general, la participación de la Unión en el proceso de negociación del TLC. ABSTRACTA significant number of nongovernmental environmental groups in Mexico-concerned about the environment and recognizing that there are no ecological borders between Mexico, the United States, and Canada- began offering concrete proposals in this issue area as soon as the three country governments announced the commencement of negotiations toward a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The group's goal has been to convince the negotiators of this trilateral accord to include adequate protections that will ensure that anticipated increases in economic activity and exchange of goods and services (and therefore significant increases in all activities that depend on the exploitation of natural resources) will not have a deleterious impact on the environment and on efforts to preserve the natural resources of these three countries. Mexico finds itself at a critical juncture of negative environmental impacts. The I.A.P. (which joins together thirty-three environmental groups) has not limited itself to warning of these present dangers; rather, it has taken a proactive stance, holding that the FTA should be implemented only if it guarantees environmental protections and quality of life. This article takes a broad look at the role played by the I.A.P. Union in the FTA negotiating process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontera norteSame topicClimate Change Policy and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207