MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770065730 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxx154

A mobile yellow nodule under the foreskin of a toddler

2017· article· en· W2770065730 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Burleigh, Joseph M. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeskinToddlerNodule (geology)Computer scienceMedicineBiologyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPaleontologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A previously healthy uncircumcised 2-year-old boy presented with a 1-year history of an asymptomatic mobile yellow nodule near the base of the glans penis. He was otherwise healthy. On examination, there was a 1.5 × 1.0 cm mobile yellow nodule between the glans and the foreskin on the penis (Figures 1 and 2). Lateral view of a mobile yellow nodule between the glans and the foreskin on the penis of an uncircumcised 2-year-old male. Anterior view of a mobile yellow nodule between the glans and the foreskin on the penis of an uncircumcised 2-year-old male. Based on the morphology and location of the lesion, the nodule was diagnosed as a smegma pearl. Smegma is a collection of desquamated epithelial cell debris produced within the subprepucial space. As physiological phimosis resolves, foreskin adhesions begin to break down and the inner foreskin detaches from the glans penis. Smegma can become entrapped during this process, forming smooth palpable pearls (1). Although children are frequently referred to paediatric dermatologists with smegma pearls, given the paucity of published reports, they can pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians unfamiliar with this entity. The differential diagnosis for smegma pearls includes preputial cyst, prepucial Epstein pearl, median raphe cyst, smegmalith and foreign body (1). The location and age of onset help differentiate these from smegma pearls. Preputial cysts are located under the glans while prepucial Epstein pearls are located at the tip of the foreskin and fade by 1 week of life. Median raphe cysts present on the ventral surface of the penis near the glans and smegmaliths typically present in the adult population as hard stony structures. Smegma pearls are a benign entity with anticipated spontaneous resolution. Treatment should include monitoring for resolution with parental reassurance. Bimanual retraction and manual expression of smegma is possible but poses a theoretical risk for paraphimosis, a urological emergency. This procedure can lead to possible irritation of the foreskin, recurrence of phimosis, and ultimately recurrence of the smegma pearl (2). Proper counseling regarding the natural history of this entity can alleviate parental anxiety and prevent unnecessary investigations or interventions. Funding sources: None. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose; this paper has not previously been published or presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207