Cryptic gene pools in the Hypericum perforatum–H. maculatum complex: diploid persistence versus trapped polyploid melting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: In Central Europe Hypericum perforatum and Hypericum maculatum show significant hybridization and introgression as a consequence of Pleistocene range fluctuations, and their gene pools are merging on higher ploidy levels. This paper discusses whether polyploid hybrid gene pools are trapped in the ecological climatic niche space of their diploid ancestors, and tests the idea of geographical parthenogenesis. Methods: DNA sequence information of nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid loci, ploidy level estimates and ecological niche modelling are used to characterize the various diploid and polyploid gene pools and unravel spatio-temporal patterns of gene flow among them. Key Results: On the diploid level, the three gene pools are clearly distinct between and within species of H. perforatum (two gene pools) and H. maculatum, and their divergence dates back to the first half of the Pleistocene. All polyploids in Central Europe show high levels of past and contemporary gene flow between all three gene pools. The correlation of genetic and geographical distances breaks down if the latter is larger than 250 km, indicating recent and ongoing gene flow. The two species are ecologically differentiated, but in particular hybrids among all three gene pools do not show significant niche differences compared to their parental gene pools, except for some combinations with H. maculatum. Conclusions: Inter- and intraspecific gene flow between inter- and intra-species gene pools is limited on the diploid level, and the geographical distribution of the diploids largely reflects Pleistocene evolutionary history. Secondary contact promoted hybridization and introgression on the polyploid level, enabling offspring to escape the diploid gene pools. However, the hybrid polyploids do not show significant niche differences compared to their diploid progenitors. It is concluded that the observed absence of niche divergence has precluded further differentiation and geographical partitioning of new polyploid lineages being effectively separated from the parental lines. The predominantly apomictic reproducing polyploids are trapped in the polyploid gene pool and the ecological climatic niche space of their diploid ancestors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".