MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770158411 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2017-0436

A water-soluble Tb<sup>III</sup> complex as a temperature-sensitive luminescent probe

2017· article· en· W2770158411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jorge H. S. K. Monteiro, Fernando A. Sigoli, Ana de Bettencourt‐Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhosphorescenceExcited stateLuminescenceQuantum yieldAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Intramolecular forceAtmospheric temperature rangeIridiumTitrationAcceptorStoichiometryEmission intensityPhotochemistryMass spectrometryFluorescencePhysical chemistryAtomic physicsIonStereochemistryCatalysisThermodynamicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The water soluble [Tb(dipicCbz) 3 ] 3− (dipicCbz = 4-(9H-carbazol-9-yl-)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylato) complex was isolated and evaluated as a temperature sensor in water. The 1:3 (Tb III :dipicCbz 2− ) stoichiometry in solution was confirmed by luminescence titration and high-resolution mass spectrometry. The quantum yield of sensitized emission is 3.8% ± 0.4% at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C, and the emission intensity depends on the temperature in the range of 5–70 °C with a relative thermal sensitivity of 3.4% °C −1 at 35 °C and temperature resolution &lt; 0.01 °C in the range of 30–40 °C. The reversibility of this behavior was demonstrated for three heating–cooling cycles. Calculations of the energy gap between donor and acceptor show that the temperature dependence of the emission intensity is due to back-energy transfer from the Tb 5 D 4 excited state to the triplet and twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) states of the dipicCbz. The assignment of one of the energy levels as a TICT state was confirmed by the temperature-dependent behavior of the phosphorescence band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207