MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770245348 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aad691

SYGMA: Stellar Yields for Galactic Modeling Applications

2018· article· en· W2770245348 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Ritter, Benoît Côté, Falk Herwig, Julio F. Navarro, Chris L. Fryer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSupernovaEjectaMetallicityStarsStellar evolutionRadiative transferBinary numberAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Stellar Yields for Galactic Modeling Applications (SYGMA) code is an open-source module that models the chemical ejecta and feedback of simple stellar populations (SSPs). It is intended for use in hydrodynamical simulations and semi-analytic models of galactic chemical evolution. The module includes the enrichment from asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, massive stars, Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and compact binary mergers. An extensive and extendable stellar yields library includes the NuGrid yields with all elements and many isotopes up to Bi. Stellar feedback from mechanic and frequency-dependent radiative luminosities are computed based on NuGrid stellar models and their synthetic spectra. The module further allows for customizable initial mass functions and SN Ia delay-time distributions to calculate time-dependent ejecta based on stellar yield input. A variety of r-process sites can be included. A comparison of SSP ejecta based on NuGrid yields with those from Portinari et al. and Marigo reveals up to factors of 3.5 and 4.8 less C and N enrichment from AGB stars at low metallicity, a result we attribute to NuGrid’s modeling of hot-bottom burning. Different core-collapse supernova explosions and fallback prescriptions may lead to substantial variations for the accumulated ejecta of C, O and Si in the first 107 years at Z = 0.001. An online interface of the open-source SYGMA module enables interactive simulations, analysis, and data extraction of the evolution of all species formed by the evolution of simple stellar populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207