MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770253777 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.020

Sex differences in white matter alterations following repetitive subconcussive head impacts in collegiate ice hockey players

2017· article· en· W2770253777 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nico Sollmann, Paul S. Echlin, Vivian Schultz, Petra Viher, Amanda E. Lyall, Yorghos Tripodis, David Kaufmann, Elisabeth Härtl, Philipp Kinzel, Lorie A. Forwell, Andrew M. Johnson, Elaine N. Skopelja, Christian Lepage, Sylvain Bouix, Ofer Pasternak, Alexander Lin, Martha E. Shenton, Inga K. Koerte

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaWestern University
FundersCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Trillium FoundationNational Institutes of HealthLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity of British ColumbiaDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstOntario Neurotrauma FoundationMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’OntarioMinistry of Culture, Sports and TourismOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareMinistère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport QuébecU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsIce hockeyConcussionFractional anisotropyDiffusion MRISuperior longitudinal fasciculusWhite matterPsychologyNeurocognitiveMedicinePoison controlPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMagnetic resonance imagingCognitionInjury preventionNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Repetitive subconcussive head impacts (RSHI) may lead to structural, functional, and metabolic alterations of the brain. While differences between males and females have already been suggested following a concussion, whether there are sex differences following exposure to RSHI remains unknown. The aim of this study was to identify and to characterize sex differences following exposure to RSHI. METHODS: Twenty-five collegiate ice hockey players (14 males and 11 females, 20.6 ± 2.0 years), all part of the Hockey Concussion Education Project (HCEP), underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) before and after the Canadian Interuniversity Sports (CIS) ice hockey season 2011-2012 and did not experience a concussion during the season. Whole-brain tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) were used to compare pre- and postseason imaging in both sexes for fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). Pre- and postseason neurocognitive performance were assessed by the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT). RESULTS: Significant differences between the sexes were primarily located within the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), the internal capsule (IC), and the corona radiata (CR) of the right hemisphere (RH). In significant voxel clusters (p < 0.05), decreases in FA (absolute difference pre- vs. postseason: 0.0268) and increases in MD (0.0002), AD (0.00008), and RD (0.00005) were observed in females whereas males showed no significant changes. There was no significant correlation between the change in diffusion scalar measures over the course of the season and neurocognitive performance as evidenced from postseason ImPACT scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest sex differences in structural alterations following exposure to RSHI. Future studies need to investigate further the underlying mechanisms and association with exposure and clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207