Frequency of and reasons for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria screening in patients with unexplained anaemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Referral to hematology for anemia is common. In paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), cells deficient in the glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI) anchor are lysed by complement. Eculizumab improves overall survival and quality of life while reducing hemolysis, transfusion requirements, and thrombosis. We evaluated the frequency of screening for PNH in patients with unexplained anemia. Key clinical features, laboratory data, and investigations were recorded for patients referred for anemia since 2010, without a specific cause found. PNH testing was done by flow cytometry. 540 patients had: anemia not yet diagnosed (NYD, n=318 (including unexplained iron deficiency, n=92; DAT-negative hemolysis, n=9)); anemia of chronic disease, n=173; and pancytopenia NYD, n=49. 82.4% had LDH testing done; 85.0% total bilirubin; 78.7% reticulocyte counts; and 40.6% haptoglobin level; 131 (24.2%) had possible hemolysis. PNH testing was done in 56 (10.4%). Those screened for PNH were more likely to have: younger age (P=0.04); a history of thrombosis (P<0.001); undergone a BMBx (P<0.001); received RBC transfusions (P=0.0018); or evidence of DAT-negative hemolysis (P<0.001). In summary, PNH was tested for in a minority of patients with unexplained anemia (10.4%) despite potential indicators of hemolysis in 24.2%. Increased screening could identify patients who would benefit from treatment and should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".