MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770406663 · doi:10.1177/0142331217731616

Application of adaptive sliding mode control for nonlinear systems with unknown polynomial bounded uncertainties

2017· article· en· W2770406663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlNonlinear systemOvershoot (microwave communication)Adaptive controlBounded functionVariable structure controlNorm (philosophy)PolynomialExponential stabilityTransient responseIntegral sliding modeMathematicsRobust controlComputer scienceEngineeringLawPhysicsControl (management)Mathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we discuss the application of a novel switching integral-exponential-adaptation-law-based adaptive sliding mode control design for a wide class of nonlinear systems with unknown polynomial bounds on the uncertainty norm. A robust finite time convergence, i.e. finite stability, is obtained with low chatter on control actions and a fast-transient performance for adaptive sliding mode control handling the multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems with uncertainties of amplitudes bounded within unknown polynomials in the state vector norm. The exponential term of the proposed adaptation law targets the reduction of the chatter levels of the sliding mode by significantly reducing the gain overestimation while simultaneously suppressing the overshoot by speeding up the system response to the uncertainties. It also prevents the instability issues which encounters the classic integral-gain-law-based adaptive sliding mode control when underestimating its initial gain or gain rate parameter. A simple example illustrates the motivation and feasibility of the proposed adaptive sliding mode control. The applications on a nonlinear mass–spring system and on a two degree of freedom electromechanical rotative plant demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it