MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770487799 · doi:10.1093/jahist/jax390

The Long Afterlife of Nikkei Wartime Incarceration

2017· article· en· W2770487799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cherstin M. Lyon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American History · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAfterlifeRedressHistoryPeriod (music)Spanish Civil WarSociologyWorld War IICriminologyGender studiesLawPolitical scienceAestheticsLiteratureArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Long Afterlife of Nikkei Wartime Incarceration contributes to the sparse literature on the lingering effect of the World War II incarceration experience on Japanese Americans, their children, and their grandchildren. Karen M. Inouye uses Avery F. Gordon's concept of “haunting” to analyze the “long afterlife” of incarceration in novel ways (Gordon, Ghostly Matters, 2008). Different from trauma, haunting allows one to envision how things might have been, creating a moment in which those who have suffered are moved to create a difference in the present and the future. This book, Inouye writes, is also a response to Alice Yang Murray's challenge that a book be written examining “how one individual's memories and representations of internment evolved over time” (p. 15). The result is a series of chapters organized around the lives of individuals (with a chapter on Canadian redress as the only exception to this structure). Individuals' wartime incarceration experiences took years to process, with meanings evolving over time and shaped by the postwar period. Furthermore, their wartime experiences continued to color how they approached their careers, and affected matters involving the rights of others long after the war was over and the camps had been closed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American HistorySame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207