Compulsive sexual behaviour in Parkinson’s disease is associated with higher doses of levodopa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research estimates the lifetime prevalence of compulsive sexual behaviour (CSB) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) to be 2.7%. CSB has also been associated with male gender and earlier onset of PD.1 Although both dopamine agonists (DAs) and, to a lesser extent, levodopa have been associated with impulsive compulsive behaviours (ICBs),2 it is still unclear whether higher levodopa doses are a risk factor for the development of CSB in patients with PD. Patients with ICBs were identified from a database of individuals with PD and ICBs who were seen at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK, and who had participated in three previous research projects over an 8-year period (from 2008 to 2016). All the ICB cases were recruited to research studies from PD clinics at the National Hospital and selected due to the reporting of ICBs. All cases underwent a thorough clinical investigation as well as a detailed semistructured interview conducted by one of the authors. Hospital notes were reviewed by a movement disorder specialist (PMB) for clinical and demographic data. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was calculated according to previously published guidelines.3 Data were analysed using the software SPSS V.24. In total, 128 patients with PD and ICBs were identified. Seventeen cases were excluded because data on dopaminergic treatment when the ICB was most active were incomplete. The remaining 111 patients were included in the analysis. Nearly 75% of the …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it