MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770656745 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxx113

A 14-year-old girl with short stature, incomplete puberty and severe menstrual bleeding

2017· editorial· en· W2770656745 on OpenAlexaff
Alexa Marr, Karolyn Hardy, J. E. Curtis

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlShort statureMedicinePediatricsPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 14-year-old girl was seen in her local emergency department following multiple syncopal episodes with loss of consciousness following 1 week of severe vaginal bleeding. She was tachycardic and had orthostatic hypotension and a haemoglobin of 50 g/L. She was treated with multiple blood transfusions, tranexamic acid and oral contraceptive (OCP) tablets. Her menarche occurred 3 months earlier, and she had three normal cycles before presentation. She weighed 46.9 kg (25th–50th percentile); her height was 143.3 cm (<<3rd percentile) and well below mid-parental height (167.6 cm, 75th percentile). Her BMI Z-score was 0.92 (80th percentile). She had mild proximal muscle weakness and delayed deep tendon reflexes. Her hair was dry and she had edema of her face and extremities. She had no thyromegaly, acanthosis nigricans or hypopigmentation. She was Tanner Stage III for breast development and early Tanner II for pubic hair development and had no axillary hair. Investigations revealed normal coagulation studies, liver function, creatinine, glucose and electrolytes. Her beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (BHCG) screen was negative. Her transabdominal ultrasound showed clots in the uterus, no evidence of ovarian cysts and a moderate amount of free fluid in the pelvis. She had a normal echocardiogram.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0120.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207